Skip to main content

Hacker - hero or villain?

I recently watched a documentary on UK satellite TV that seemingly portrayed the life of a computer hacker as glamorous, edgy and cool.  The hackers interviewed were all American, male, typically geeky with a fake hate of institutionalism and popular culture.

Many argued they 'hacked', or 'cracked' as some term it, simply for the enjoyment and prestige of being able to 'beat' large corporations or public organizations, that have spent vast sums on securing information systems and networks.  The thrill of a one-man-band crusade and coming out on top, spurs many individuals on to continually attempt to break and overcome security controls.  They argued that in fact they were helping the internal security teams by simply identifying where weak controls exist, before 'real' damage could occur.  Who and what caused the 'real' damage still seemed unquantified by the hacker community interviewed by the program maker.

Are You The Next Hacker Hero?

In defense of that argument, the term 'ethical hacker' has become popular in recent terms to define individuals and consultancy practices that do perform penetration and vunerability testing.  Their aim is help organizations find weaknesses in the security defense layers either from a network, protocol, application or process level.  Certifications such as the CEH or CHFI testify to this as being a sustainable niche industry and in-demand part of information security.  The 'official' hacker on the one hand often derides the term 'ethical', arguing that although the courses and certifications give the individual a technical back ground in the skills needed to overcome protective security controls, the 'ethical hacker' often doesn't have the drive, motive or natural ambition to overcome and beat the underlying mentality of protectionism.

But does the hacker or even the ethical version, actually provide a worthwhile service in the asset protection arena?  Many security related projects, either from a provisioning, firewall or application development stand point are often viewed as costly, non-profit impacting and more as a luxury rather than an essential.

As with most things, the more people are involved in developing a following or a practice, it will start to become mainstream and become professionalized and controlled.  Many would probably disagree, but the underlying reason for this is to make money.  As more and more people become skilled in the tool box of the hacker, we will probably become better equipped are preventing lower level attacks that several years ago would have been difficult to counteract.

But with most things, they evolve and the tools and skills or the hacker will evolve too, which in a perverse way keeps information security professionals in work, and certifications in high demand.


Popular posts from this blog

2020: Machine Learning, Post Quantum Crypto & Zero Trust

Welcome to a digital identity project in 2020! You'll be expected to have a plan for post-quantum cryptography.  Your network will be littered with "zero trust" buzz words, that will make you suspect everyone, everything and every transaction.  Add to that, “machines” will be learning everything, from how you like your coffee, through to every network, authentication and authorisation decision. OK, are you ready?

Machine Learning I'm not going to do an entire blog on machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI).  Firstly I'm not qualified enough on the topic and secondly I want to focus on the security implications.  Needless to say, within 3 years, most organisations will have relatively experienced teams who are handling big data capture from an and identity, access management and network perspective.

That data will be being fed into ML platforms, either on-premise, or via cloud services.  Leveraging either structured or unstructured learning, data fr…

Customer Data: Convenience versus Security

Organisations in both the public and private sector are initiating programmes of work to convert previously physical or offline services, into more digital, on line and automated offerings.  This could include things like automated car tax purchase, through to insurance policy management and electricity meter reading submission and reporting.

Digitization versus Security

This move towards a more on line user experience, brings together several differing forces.  Firstly the driver for end user convenience and service improvement, against the requirements of data security and privacy.  Which should win?  There clearly needs to be a balance of security against service improvement.  Excessive and prohibitive security controls would result in a complex and often poor user experience, ultimately resulting in fewer users.  On the other hand, poorly defined security architectures, lead to data loss, with the impact for personal exposure and brand damage.

Top 5 Security Predictions for 2016

It's that time of year again, when the retrospective and predictive blogs come out of the closet, just before the Christmas festivities begin.  This time last year, the 2015 predictions were an interesting selection of both consumer and enterprise challenges, with a focus on:

Customer Identity ManagementThe start of IoT security awarenessReduced Passwords on MobileConsumer PrivacyCloud Single Sign On
In retrospect, a pretty accurate and ongoing list.  Consumer related identity (cIAM) is hot on most organisation's lips, and whilst the password hasn't died (and probably never will) there are more people using things like swipe login and finger print authentication than ever before.

But what will 2016 bring?

Mobile Payments to be Default for Consumers

2015 has seen the rise in things like Apple Pay and Samsung Pay hitting the consumer high street with venom.  Many retail outlets now provide the ability to "tap and pay" using a mobile device, with many banks also offer…